As new targets are set for emissions, and the threat of climate change becomes ever more apparent, all sectors of business have to rethink how they operate and the methods they use to complete projects. The civil engineering sector is no different. Concrete is a versatile and high-quality construction material but it comes with a range of environmental negatives. However, new technologies and processes are being developed that greatly reduce its environmental cost.
Concrete and CO2
According to a 2018 report by Chatham House, cement is the most widely used construction material in the world. It is also a major source of carbon dioxide; contributing around eight per cent of the worlds CO2 emissions.
It’s clear that a way to make cement more eco-friendly or an alternative must be found if the civil engineering sector is to make significant steps to reducing its environmental impact.
Alternatives To Cement
One alternative to cement is already showing significant environmental benefits over traditional alternatives. Geosynthetic Cementitious Composite Mats (GCCMs) were developed by two university students, Peter Brewin and William Crawford in 2004. The fabric is called Concrete Canvas, and is made up of a geotextile filled with a cement powder mix. This means the fabric only needs to be cut to size, secured and hydrated to start the process of forming a concrete layer for civils applications.
Concrete Canvas Ltd was formed in 2005 to develop and commercialise this technology. Since then their product has been used in more than 80 counties on a variety of civil engineering projects.
There are several key environmental benefits to
using this unique fabric compared to traditional poured or sprayed concrete,
and the UK’s Environment Agency already recognise the material as being an
eco-friendly concrete alterative, having used the material themselves on
several projects on environmentally sensitive sites.
No need for mixing
One of the underappreciated elements of working with
traditional cement and concrete is the need to create the mixture either on-site
or transport it to site in a mixing truck. These mixing trucks can end up
running for long periods of time as the work is carried out, which results in
further environmental impact from the project as a whole.
Mixing trucks also have a limited amount of time for transporting the material to sites as the cement will otherwise begin to set, and would be unusable when arriving on site. Concrete Canvas can, therefore, be transported considerably further, allowing it to be exported for use on sites worldwide rather than having to be sourced locally like traditional concretes.
As no mixing is needed with Concrete Canvas, there is no need for mixing trucks. The GCCM arrives on-site as a roll of fabric ready to be installed. The fabric can be cut using simple hand tools and requires no specialised training. One pallet of Concrete Canvas can cover the area it would take two 17 ton mixing trucks for a range of applications. The fabric can also be used for concrete repair, rather than using the same traditional methods that were used to install the concrete initially.
A further benefit of not needing mixing trucks is
the overall speed with which projects can be completed. Concrete Canvas can be
installed up to 10 times faster than traditional sprayed or poured concrete.
The fabric can be laid at rates of up to 200m² per hour and is set and usable
just 24 hours after hydration.
All of these factors mean that the overall time for
engineering projects and on-site work can be reduced, leading to a reduction in
the other elements which can contribute to pollution, such as generators for
lights and other services. Also, Concrete Canvas requires fewer workers to
install the fabric compared to traditional solutions, meaning there is a
reduction in the environmental impact of those travelling to the site.
Use any source of
While Concrete Canvas does require water to begin the curing process, one of the environmental benefits is that any water can be used. This means both fresh and saltwater can be used, and there is no difference in the end result. For projects that are in more remote locations, this allows workers to use the closest water supply and not have to transport water in just for use on the project. This yields yet more savings on the energy and emission used for transportation.
Low alkaline reserve
and carbon footprint
GCCMs have a low alkaline reserve level and a low washout rate. This allows the material to be hydrated without the need for prior treatment of any runoff before it mixes with local watercourses as it will not adversely affect the local ecology. Furthermore, the overall carbon footprint of the material is low, which makes its impact on sensitive agricultural and environmental sites lower than traditional solutions.
When working in hard to reach areas which may be
environmentally sensitive, using GCCMs is more sensible than poured or sprayed
concrete. Not only is there no waste from concrete back-spray or spillages, but
the amount of machinery required to install GCCMs in comparison to traditional
solutions is significantly less, this causes far less disruption to the
environment and similarly to any nearby residential areas.
Considering the benefits of GCCMs and the
considerable environmental impact of traditional concrete and cement, it is
expected that GCCMs and other concrete alternatives will be more widely used in
the coming years. Sectors which have already used this alternative concrete
solution include mining, agriculture, petrochemical, road and rail.
The post Concrete on a roll: changing engineering projects worldwide appeared first on Environment Blog.