New research has found that state and territory governments need to make major reforms to their environmental laws and increase compliance regimes to meet the proposed national standards.
The findings are revealed in a report from the Places You Love alliance of conservation groups, released today, which found “not only does no state or territory law meet national standards, but in some jurisdictions, the environmental protections in state and territory laws have actually been weakened”.
Melbourne’s The Age newspaper reports this week the Senate is set to debate the federal government’s bill to hand approval powers for major projects to state governments, in a bid to remove bureaucratic duplication and speed-up project development to boost the economy.
The Environment Minister in the conservative Liberal-Nation government Sussan Ley has pledged that any changes to The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act ) will not reduce current level of environmental regulation.
“States will be more accountable and their accreditation will depend on it, there is a clear message to the states in this,” Ms Ley said in August.
It passed the lower house in August and could be enacted as soon as next week, ahead of a major review of the laws by former competition watchdog boss Professor Graeme Samuel, which is due by the end of October.
Professor Samuel said Australia’s “current environmental trajectory is unsustainable”.
Ms Ley told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age that the legislation now before Parliament was “the first step in a process” and there would be “further tranches of legislation following the Samuel Review, and each state will need to be able to assure the Commonwealth in relation to their processes”.
Ms Ley has previously ruled out federal funding to help the state governments get up to speed, or creation of an independent watchdog agency to check their compliance.
Rachel Walmsley, head of law reform for Environmental Defenders Office which prepared the Places You Love report, warned a “significant amount of legislative reform would be required” for each state to grant their bureaucracies the same or greater level of environmental protection powers as the current federal regime.
The EPBC Act was enacted in 1999 and created a list of “matters of national environmental significance”, including World Heritage areas, internationally listed wetlands and threatened species.
While state laws do include some protections for these matters, federal government has wielded the most powerful protections for the past two decades.
The report found no state or territory legislation met the necessary suite of “national environmental standards required to protect matters of national environmental significance”.
States run their own offset policies, which can allow developers who destroy protected habitat to mitigate the damage by protecting or restoring habitat somewhere else.
State offset standards frequently do not meet national standards.
“State and territories’ laws haven’t been designed to address all the matters of national environmental significance,” Ms Walmsley said.
“The bill before parliament is even talking about accrediting environment laws down to the local government level, which certainly weren’t designed with matters of national environmental significance in mind.
“There are major gaps and a very significant amount of legislative work for them to do.”
EcoNews is an independent publication that relies on contributions from its readers.
WE’RE BUILDING A PLATFORM WITH A CLEAR FOCUS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL GOOD. CONTRIBUTE AND TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE AN IMPACT.
If you value EcoNews, but are unable to contribute via sponsorship or advertising we ask that you promote our online store The Native Shop – www.nativeshop.com.au via your social media to assist us to fund this valuable service.